Prediction of David Pate vs Danie Visser Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Pate vs D. Visser

David Pate

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Danie Visser

RSA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Pate 1 - 2 Visser

They have played 7 sets in total, with David Pate winning 3 and Danie Visser winning 4. The last match between Danie Visser and David Pate was at the Stratton Mountain, 03-08-1987, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Danie Visser getting the victory 7-6 3-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pate	1
Visser	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) Stratton Mountain(08-03-87)

Stats

Danie Visser

David Pate

(R3) Honolulu(09-24-84)

Stats

David Pate

Danie Visser

(QF) Vienna CH(03-05-84)

Stats

Danie Visser

David Pate

D. Pate vs D. Visser H2H Profile

D. Pate	Stats	D. Visser
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.85% (195-174)	Career Total W/L	44.05% (111-141)
1	Hard	1
0	Indoor	1
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Pate vs D. Visser Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), David Pate has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Danie Visser has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show David Pate, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danie Visser has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: David Pate has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danie Visser has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year David Pate has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Danie Visser winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: David Pate has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 123/99), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 5/14). Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/17).
Player level: In the last year, David Pate has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with David Pate winning 1 times and Danie Visser being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with David Pate winning 3 and Danie Visser winning 4.
The last match between David Pate and Danie Visser was at the Stratton Mountain, 03-08-1987, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Danie Visser getting the victory 7-6 3-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, David Pate has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Danie Visser has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, David Pate has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danie Visser has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, David Pate has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danie Visser has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

David Pate vs Danie Visser Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Pate vs D. Visser H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Pate	Stats	D. Visser
1	H2H Matches Won	2
3	Sets Won	4
34	Games Won	38
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Pate Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tokyo - 10-04-1995
R1 Kotaro MiyachiK. Miyachi	L	6-2 2-6 6-3	Stats
Tokyo - 04-04-1994
R2 Jonathan StarkJ. Stark	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
R1 Shuzo MatsuokaS. Matsuoka	W	6-4 1-6 6-3	Stats
Queen's Club - 07-06-1993
R1 Jamie MorganJ. Morgan	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Scottsdale - 22-02-1993
R1 Andrei ChesnokovA. Chesnokov	L	6-3 3-6 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski	L	7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 05-08-1991
R1 Ronald AgenorR. Agenor	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(2)	Stats
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Berlin - 08-10-1990
R1 Franco DavinF. Davin	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Pate vs D. Visser Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Pate	Stats	D. Visser
52.85% (195/174)	YTD Win/Loss	44.05% (111/141)
51.39% (480/454)	Sets Win/Loss	46.67% (315/360)
50.49% (4648/4558)	Games Win/Loss	49.16% (3314/3427)
55.41% (123/99)	Hard Win/Loss	45.19% (61/74)
26.32% (5/14)	Clay Win/Loss	26.09% (6/17)
50.70% (36/35)	Indoor Hard W/L	48.00% (12/13)
54.39% (31/26)	Grass Win/Loss	46.38% (32/37)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
306.26	Average Opponent Rank	379.74
38.10% (16/26)	Slam W/L	48.94% (23/24)
40.63% (13/19)	Masters W/L	41.38% (12/17)
55.27% (152/123)	Main Tour W/L	39.31% (57/88)
70.00% (14/6)	Challenger W/L	61.29% (19/12)
55% (178/322)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (85/199)
36% (17/47)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	48% (25/52)
36% (5/14)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	67% (2/3)
54% (67/125)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (37/89)
83% (197/163)	1st Set Won, Won Match	72% (121/87)
17% (197/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	28% (121/34)
19% (172/32)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (130/23)